Free Quality Management Plan Template
Word Download
A defect you prevent costs far less than a defect you find at handover. This seven-section Word template helps you set quality standards, acceptance criteria, checks and inspections before delivery starts. Your team knows what "done" looks like, and your customer knows exactly what they will be accepting.
No email required. Instant Word download.
Quick answer
A quality management plan defines the quality standards a project must meet and how they will be assured and checked. This free seven-section Word template covers standards, acceptance criteria, quality assurance and quality control activities, and cost of quality, aligned with PMBOK.
If you want to understand quality management itself, with the PMP angle and real examples, read my project quality management guide. This page is for the template: what to write in each section, a filled-in example and the mistakes I see most.
What's in the quality management plan template?
The plan covers quality from start to finish: what quality means on this project, how you will check it, how defects are handled and who is responsible for each check. Fill it in during planning and review it at each phase gate.
What is the difference between quality assurance and quality control?
QA and QC are not the same, though people mix them up all the time. Getting this right decides whether you are preventing problems or just finding them. Prevention is almost always cheaper.
You need both. QA without QC means you may follow the right process and still hand over defects. QC without QA means you find defects late, when they cost more to fix. Put more QA effort where the work is complex and more QC where a failure would hurt most.
How do you write acceptance criteria?
Acceptance criteria are the most practical part of the plan. Vague criteria cause arguments at handover. Clear, testable criteria prevent them. Get every criterion agreed by the customer or sponsor before work starts, not when you present the deliverable.
Example Acceptance Criteria: System Deliverable
| Deliverable | Acceptance Criterion | How Verified | Verified By |
|---|---|---|---|
| Invoice Processing Module | System processes 1,000 invoices per hour with zero data loss under peak load conditions | Load test with 1,000 concurrent transactions: verified by performance test report | Test Manager |
| Invoice Processing Module | Error rate below 0.1% across a test dataset of 10,000 representative invoices | Batch test run: error count verified against test log | Test Manager |
| User Interface | All critical user journeys completable by 95% of test participants without assistance in usability testing | Moderated usability test with 20 representative users | UX Lead |
| Data Migration | 100% of 47,000 live records migrated with zero data corruption: verified by reconciliation report | Automated reconciliation: source vs target record count and spot-check audit | Data Lead + Client Sign-Off |
Look at what each criterion has: a number, a test method, a sample size and a named checker. None of them say "acceptable", "adequate" or "good performance". Each one can be passed or failed without argument.
Example: acceptance criteria for a building project
The sample above is for a software system. Here is the same table filled in for construction work, the way it often looks in an inspection and test plan. This is an example only. Use your own project specification for the actual numbers.
| Deliverable | Acceptance criterion | How it is checked | Who accepts |
|---|---|---|---|
| Concrete slab, Level 2 | Cube test results meet the strength in the project specification | Lab cube tests at the ages the specification sets | Consultant structural engineer |
| Blockwork walls, Level 2 | Line, level and plumb within specification tolerance. No cracks. | Hold point inspection with checklist before plaster starts | Consultant site inspector |
| Fire alarm system | All devices pass the functional test. Authority approval received. | Witness test with the consultant, then Civil Defence inspection | Consultant, then Civil Defence |
Mistakes I see when people fill this in
- "As per specification" and nothing else. Say which clause, which test and who checks it.
- No hold points. If the plan does not stop work for inspection, the next trade will cover up the problem.
- QA and QC mixed together. Keep process checks and output checks in their own sections.
- Nobody named to accept. "Client" is not enough. Name the role that signs.
Cost of Quality: Four Categories to Budget For
Quality work costs money, so put a rough estimate in the plan and include it in the budget. The four standard categories below cover all quality spending, from prevention to the cost of failures the customer finds.
Where to put your money: spend on prevention and appraisal early. Projects that cut these costs usually pay more later in rework, re-inspection and complaints. A small amount spent on a design check that stops a big rework is not a cost. It is a saving.
Quality Management Plan: 4 Common Questions
Keep learning
- Free Resource Plan Template: Excel Download
- Free Meeting Minutes Template: Excel Download
- Free Action Item Tracker Template: Excel Download
- Free Issue Log Template: Excel Download
- Free Decision Log Template: Excel Download
- Free Change Request Form Template: Word Download